Firstly, I know that I have to trust the process and
articulate to my students that this process is not only valid but beneficial in
the short and long ranges of their education.
Next, I need to continually work on the social and personal dimensions
of the framework, building trust and personal interest. As a chemistry teacher this seems like a
foreign concept yet it is a key to unlocking my students’ willingness to
participate. How can I create a space in
which a student who has failed multiple science classes will volunteer his/her
answer or thoughts? How can I personally
connect what we are reading about with students’ lives? How can I make it matter? (Please excuse the chemistry pun.) Furthermore, I need to create a class
structure and curriculum that holds my students accountable to doing their
work. For example, my warm up questions
need to challenge students with what they read and recorded in their
metacognitive logs the night before. The
warm up questions need to be important, challenging, and supportive. I have also been noticing that when I provide
students direct feedback on their work (not just a grade), the students pay
attention to what I have said in a far greater way than if I had made a class
announcement about the same idea. This
is a time-intensive move but it is a strategic way to increase my students’
compliance.
Are you looking for ways to engage your students in the
process? Have you figured out something
that seems to be working for our student population? What else might we do as teachers to keep
students in the mental workout of Reading Apprenticeship? Please comment with your ideas.